awesome-seedance
Reduces prompt engineering trial-and-error by providing 600+ validated cases with cross-model testing results, accelerating time-to-production for AI video w…
🎬 Evidence-led Seedance 2.5 / 2.0 prompt library: 600+ cases traced to original posts, 260+ cross-model retest runs with public verdicts, 25 copy-ready templates, 50+ installable AI-video Skills. Synced daily from goodcase.ai. EN / 中文 / 日本語.
- Generate video prompts using tested templates from 600+ documented cases
- Find proven prompt patterns across multiple AI video models with public results
- Automate video skill setup with 50+ ready-to-install configuration templates
Reduces prompt engineering trial-and-error by providing 600+ validated cases with cross-model testing results, accelerating time-to-production for AI video workflows and cutting debugging cycles.
ML engineers and prompt specialists building AI video generation pipelines who need evidence-backed templates and reproducible prompt patterns.
https://github.com/LearnPrompt/awesome-seedance
By LearnPrompt
How to Get It
claude plugins install LearnPrompt/awesome-seedance
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me generate video prompts using tested templates from 600+ documented cases
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 1,701 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 1,701 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.