better-writing
Technical documentation and internal comms often suffer from unclear prose, causing misunderstandings and slower team onboarding.
An agent skill for prose that sounds clear, specific, and human.
- Ask Claude to rewrite technical documentation to sound clearer for non-expert readers.
- Generate polished email communications that are specific and professional.
- Improve blog posts and articles to read more naturally and engage readers better.
Technical documentation and internal comms often suffer from unclear prose, causing misunderstandings and slower team onboarding. This agent skill reduces ambiguity and improves readability of written outputs, directly lowering support requests and knowledge-sharing friction.
Documentation teams and engineering leads maintaining runbooks, RFCs, and internal wikis.
https://github.com/forjd/better-writing
By forjd
How to Get It
claude plugins install forjd/better-writing
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Rewrite technical documentation to sound clearer for non-expert readers
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Growing
Discussed on Hacker News
- Ask HN: How do I teach myself better writing skills? — Hacker News · 26 pts
- Ask HN: Courses or Books in Better Writing — Hacker News · 9 pts
- Quill.org: better writing with machine learning — Hacker News · 4 pts
3 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 36 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 36 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.