cm-workflow
Automates multi-stage code review and refinement cycles within Claude's native environment, reducing manual QA overhead and ensuring consistent quality gates…
Codex-native, spec-driven AI Agent workflow with Claude Code compatibility, independent review, QA, fixes, and refactors.
- Automate code review cycles by running independent QA checks before deployment.
- Generate refactored code versions with built-in testing and validation steps.
- Execute multi-stage workflows that verify specs, test output, and fix errors automatically.
Automates multi-stage code review and refinement cycles within Claude's native environment, reducing manual QA overhead and ensuring consistent quality gates before deployment.
Engineering teams integrating Claude Code for autonomous code generation with built-in validation and iteration workflows.
https://github.com/kingxiaozhe/cm-workflow
By kingxiaozhe
How to Get It
claude plugins install kingxiaozhe/cm-workflow
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me automate code review cycles by running independent QA checks before deployment
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 72 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 72 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.