BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

deliberation

Skill Development Usable

Ask Codex, Gemini/Antigravity, Grok (xAI), and 300+ more models through OpenRouter including Qwen, Kimi, DeepSeek for second opinions or arbiter-mediated consensus inside Claude Code.

40 starsMIT (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Reduces decision risk in code generation by collecting diverse model perspectives on architecture, implementation, and trade-offs—catching blind spots a single AI might miss.

Engineering teams evaluating AI-assisted code decisions across multiple domains or requiring consensus-driven architecture reviews.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/antonbabenko/deliberation

By antonbabenko

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install antonbabenko/deliberation

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars40Last updated2026-06-01LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-06-01 · scanner v1

Community Pulse Growing

Discussed on Hacker News

10 mentions across 1 sources

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 40 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
2/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score2.75 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedJun 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 40 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →