BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

invisible_dots

Skill Development Solid
Works inClaude Code
Solid Scanned — metadata only

Enables teams to automate repetitive testing and monitoring tasks without triggering bot detection systems, reducing manual overhead while maintaining infras…

Open-source, self-hosted alternative to OpenAI Dots, Grok Bot. Built to be undetectable by anti-bot systems.

32,318 starsMIT (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup

Enables teams to automate repetitive testing and monitoring tasks without triggering bot detection systems, reducing manual overhead while maintaining infrastructure compliance.

QA teams and DevOps engineers automating browser-based testing and monitoring workflows in restricted environments.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/feder-cr/invisible_dots

By feder-cr

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → Plugins → Add plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install feder-cr/invisible_dots

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me automate repetitive code review tasks without triggering detection systems
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars32,318Contributors1Last updated2026-10-31LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-10-31 · scanner v1

Community Pulse Growing

Discussed on Hacker News

3 mentions across 1 sources

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 31,945 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
  • Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
4/5
Versatility
5/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score3.85 / 5.00 SolidEvaluatedOct 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 31,945 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →