BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

modelplan

Skill Development Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Optimizes development costs and output quality by matching specific coding tasks to the most efficient model and effort level.

Which AI coding model, at which effort, on which plan? Recommended efforts, a leaderboard at those efforts and plan advice from modelplan.ai, in Claude Code, Codex and the terminal (plugins, Skill, CLI).

42 starsMIT (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Optimizes development costs and output quality by matching specific coding tasks to the most efficient model and effort level. This prevents over-provisioning expensive compute while ensuring high-complexity tasks receive sufficient reasoning capabilities.

Engineering managers and DevOps leads optimizing LLM spend and performance across multi-model development workflows.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/modelplan/modelplan

By modelplan

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → Plugins → Add plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install modelplan/modelplan

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me compare different AI coding models based on specific effort levels
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars42Last updated2026-10-25LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-10-25 · scanner v1

Community Pulse Growing

Discussed on Hacker News

3 mentions across 1 sources

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 42 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
2/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score2.75 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedOct 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 42 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →