REA-Reconstruction-Companion
Enables teams to systematically reconstruct software systems using Resource-Event-Agent modeling, reducing ambiguity in legacy system analysis and improving …
Open-source, model-independent Agent Skill for evidence-based software reconstruction with REA. Optional integration, portable installer, and validation workflows.
- Ask Claude to validate software architecture against REA framework principles and identify gaps.
- Generate reconstruction documentation for legacy systems using evidence-based REA methodology.
- Automate workflow validation for software reconstruction projects with portable installer verification.
Enables teams to systematically reconstruct software systems using Resource-Event-Agent modeling, reducing ambiguity in legacy system analysis and improving handoff accuracy between teams.
Architecture teams modernizing legacy systems or managing complex knowledge transfer during staff transitions.
https://github.com/ShadowSwaps/REA-Reconstruction-Companion
By ShadowSwaps
How to Get It
claude plugins install ShadowSwaps/REA-Reconstruction-Companion
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Validate software architecture against REA framework principles and identify gaps
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 66 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
- Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 66 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.