research-field-onboarding
Accelerates research domain knowledge transfer for AI agents, reducing hallucination and improving answer quality when teams need to onboard LLMs on propriet…
A reusable research-onboarding skill for Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, and other instruction-following agents.
- Ask Claude to structure a research onboarding plan for engineers new to your codebase.
- Generate a guided learning path for developers unfamiliar with your research domain.
- Automate creation of onboarding documentation for research-heavy projects and teams.
Accelerates research domain knowledge transfer for AI agents, reducing hallucination and improving answer quality when teams need to onboard LLMs on proprietary research or technical domains without retraining.
Engineering teams integrating AI agents into research-heavy workflows or documentation systems requiring domain-specific accuracy.
https://github.com/ljx-chase/research-field-onboarding
By ljx-chase
How to Get It
claude plugins install ljx-chase/research-field-onboarding
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Structure a research onboarding plan for engineers new to my codebase
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 75 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 75 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.